Strategic Sourcing

From a historical perspective, I can understand why Sourcing was labeled Strategic. “Strategic Sourcing” is today a part of Procurement’s DNA. Hard to neglect and yet not entirely correct.

A few decades ago, pioneering strategic frameworks raised awareness of procurement and revealed significant cost reduction potentials. Unfortunately, everything that followed that exciting new theory was less about strategy and more about tactics. For example, leveraging competition between suppliers with some analytics hardly deserves the “strategic” label.

The consulting industry further amplified the voguish factor of “strategy” and connected it to “sourcing .”This hasn’t helped.

I believe that “Strategic Sourcing” sends the wrong message to procurement stakeholders – “let’s beat suppliers … strategically!”

Here are a few thoughts from today’s perspective on why using “Strategic Sourcing” as standard procurement lingo is not correct:

Strategies need to be developed and reviewed for categories, suppliers, and risks. They always need to address top internal and external challenges and key business requirements. Also, your overarching procurement strategy needs to address the company’s needs. Finally, every strategy needs to balance global vs. local conditions in the best possible way.

In most cases, Sourcing will be an instrument to implement different strategies in procurement. In some cases, complex sourcing events, sophisticated e-auctions, etc., might require detailed planning but this is not strategy.

Sourcing is a predominantly tactical approach, today mainly supported through e-tools which can hardly be called strategic. The majority of sourcing events are, therefore well planned tactics; step 1, step 2, step 3, and there’s nothing wrong with this.

I believe we experienced significant damage through the language of “strategic sourcing” in fact, I would go as far as to say that “strategic sourcing” is an oxymoron. Nomen est omen – we created a confusing picture of our mission, skills, and expectations. So let’s talk about strategy correctly – let’s use our skills and knowledge to develop real strategies to deliver value for our stakeholders and our businesses.

You want that seat at the table. Just let them know who is really sitting there – a business partner and not a sourcing hero!

Related articles

Recent posts

Demonstrating tangible business value by implementing actionable category strategies

Too often, category strategies end up in drawers. They don’t get implemented, or struggle with low adoption. Reasons range from low stakeholder involvement or buy-in to limited practical applicability under given market conditions or simply botched implementations. With disjointed project planning, task management, and value-tracking activities, bringing the carefully created strategy to life is not a given. In the end, a strategy not implemented is a wasted strategy.

Winning over stakeholders: achieving strategic alignment in Procurement

In the webinar “Winning over stakeholders: Achieving strategic business alignment in Procurement”, Michael DeWitt, VP Indirect Spend Management & Center of Excellence at Walmart International, Sam de Frates, VP Procurement EMEAA at Mars, and Drasko Jelavic, CEO of Cirtuo, discussed with Fabian Lampe, Founder of Advance Procurement, the importance of engaging stakeholders, aligning Procurement with their objectives, and translating the objectives into actionable category, supplier, and negotiation strategies.

developing holistic category strategies

Understanding the supply market is imperative for developing holistic category strategies

Category strategies help Procurement align business requirements with market realities to leverage market opportunities, mitigate risks, and increase supply chain resilience. The methodical approach for building category strategies aims to help companies assess and plan how to best acquire goods or services for their business under given market realities. We have explored the ‘internal analysis as foundation for holistic category strategies’ in our recent blog, stating that the process of managing a category strategically is perpetual.